|
|
Posted by Larry in AZ on 11/10/07 16:25
Waiving the right to remain silent, Johan Stck <johan@stack.se> said:
> But I am still hoping to get some feedback on my initial question:
> What is the reason for having interlaced camcorders *today* with
> virtually all end-user gear (TV sets, computer screens etc) needing to
> convert it to progressive (by means of de-interlacing) before displaying
> it?
"Virtually all" end-user sets *are not* progressive. There are tens of
millions of CRT sets still in use.
--
Larry Jandro
Video Engineering & Equipment Rentals
Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
[Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to reply]
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|