Posted by gaffo on 12/22/25 11:25

TokaMundo wrote:

> On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 03:26:33 GMT, gaffo <gaffo@usenet.net> Gave us:
>
>
>>DLPs are better than LCD now.
>>
>>thay have a black level near CRT and a sharpness near LCD.
>
>
> And more anomalous artifacts than any monitor I have ever seen in my
> life. The image gets converted, and quite badly at that. The systems
> have all the motion processing of a snail.
>
> CRTs are STILL top dog on image quality. Zero artifacts is the
> number one reason that they will always beat DLPs too. Until folks
> complain, the DLP boys won't upgrade their compromise on quality
> either. Y'all gotz poor taste, and poor observational aptitude.
>
> IBMs 19 million pixel OLED monitor comes in a close second.
>
> Until OLED is mainstream, you won't see any monitor designs coming
> anywhere close to CRT performance.


obviously you've never seen the Optoma H31 then.


- I have yet to see any artifacts from it. 12-ft screen would show htem
it they existed.


only some slight rainbowing - nothing more. color is top notch, as is
sharpness.


--

If the jury feels the law is unjust, we recognize the undisputed power
of the jury to acquit, even if its verdict is contrary to the law as
given by a judge, and contrary to the evidence...If the jury feels that
the law under which the defendant is accused is unjust, or that exigent
circumstances justified the actions of the accused, or for any reason
which appeals to their logic or passion, the jury has the power to
acquit, and the courts must abide by that decision.

4th Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. Moylan, 1969

[Back to original message]