Reply to Re: Not At All Impressed With LIGHTSCRIBE...

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Marty on 01/12/61 11:39

Somewhere around Thu, 09 Feb 2006 00:59:41 +0800, while reading
alt.video.dvd.tech, I think I thought I saw this post from Oldus Fartus
<denisand@iiNOSPAMnet.net.au>:

>I had hoped that the way of the future would be the Canon s400. It had
>separate ink tanks, plus replaceable print head, which could be replaced
>with a scanner head, or with an alternative for photo-quality printing.
> The replacement carrier with print head was reasonably priced,
>complete with set of tanks, for only about 20% more than for the tanks
>alone, so gave the best of both worlds should the print head become
>clogged. Unfortunately the heads in their later printers, although
>replaceable, are not readily available and are claimed to last the life
>of the printer (whatever that is supposed to mean.)
I have an old S750 that's like that. Still works very well. A couple of
times, the colors got bad, and I removed the print head, cleaned it with
alcohol and Qtips, and it worked fine after that. Very easy.

I stopped buying original Canon ink long ago, and buy from ink4art when they
had 40% off sales. Makes it so cheap that I've already saved enough to buy
a new printer if I needed to, which I don't.

--
Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com
"Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...
well, I have others." - Groucho Marx

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"