Posted by Morton Davis on 09/06/05 03:08

"W????n" <???????@???????.gov> wrote in message
news:6dCdnb9dYKd2FIHeRVn-gg@comcast.com...
>
> "FeMaster" <FeMaster @ hotmail . com> wrote in message
> news:ToISe.4148$3R1.3861@fe06.lga...
> >
> > <1@odds.com> wrote in message
> > news:1j0lh1pkf8p2716fdc1pc5tmaog3u6a3hn@4ax.com...
> >> Much speculation has been made about the origin and operations behind
> >> the fake file problem. Here, Macrovision takes the credit....
> >>
> >> http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=897
> >
> > I love this paragraph...
> >
> > "Macrovision claims that this fake file flood is so successful that very
> > often their useless files are achieving more P2P client search engine
hits
> > than the files they are spoofing. This is due to P2P users failing to
keep
> > their shared music collections clear of corrupted or worthless files."
> >
> > And this is the BIGGEST problem we have today. People download and
> > download, but then never go back and CHECK their files. I see legit
> > accounts daily that have tons of decent content, but it is offset by the
> > number of corrupt and useless files they also have...
> >
> > People need to start checking their files and DELETING the junk! How
many
> > of you that share files in the thousands range can actually say that
they
> > have check and verified EVERY file you share? Based on the number of
> > shared
> > files with junk characters, numbers (1), improper capitalization,
> > misspellings, etc., I'd say VERY FEW can claim this...
> >
> >
>
> I can!
>
>
Mee too. I only share completed files. If they're bad - I don't share them.

[Back to original message]