Posted by 1 on 09/07/05 05:58

On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:39:10 -0700, "Don M."
<newsreader@nospam4fineartsnospam.com> wrote:

>
><1@odds.com> wrote in message news:s7ssh15g6jdem74367ecjf8q81kq2gndce@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 21:16:31 -0700, "Don M." wrote:
>> >
>> ><1@odds.com> wrote in message news:iansh1t09818n634ve8qd3243vuv21t2oq@4ax.com...
>> >> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 01:42:16 -0700, "Secret"
>> >> <sendtosecret@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> <snip>
>> >>
>> >> >|| Thanks Secret but I use Windows ME. No internal Firewall.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> You must have shit for brains! BTW.....
>> >> you probably aren't even around anymore... I just came up here to get
>> >> anybody with a real news server to wonder what post could possibly be
>> >> getting put here... now. Ha! (made you look) ;o)
>> >
>> >You quoted the wrong poster. Secret didn't write that.
>> >
>> >Don
>> >
>> Well, a screw up is a screw up... (what, me worry?) It was supposed
>> to stay up there in 2003 not get put back into circulation... who
>> quoted who didn't matter, it was just to make a reply appear a million
>> post ago... so someone like you would say... 'What the h... ?'
>> Oh well..... perhaps I'm enjoying just a bit too much
>> 'organic medicine' today?
>>
>==========
>
>It matters when you reply to Secret that he "must have shit for brains" based on your
>screwed up quoting. Cowardly, as you know he's not around.
>
>
>Don
>
Well Don, let's just have a closer look here...

I snipped what Secret had to say and left the *reply* to what Secret
said. . .

" >|| Thanks Secret but I use Windows ME. No internal Firewall. "

That was not Secret speaking, it was someone speaking to Secret.

So nothing was directed toward Secret, only the now anonymous person
making a reply to Secret. The point was not an attack on anyone, you
just read it wrong . It was just a post that was supposed to stay up
in 2003 but Giganews plugged it into today, so sue them.

[Back to original message]