Posted by anthonyberet on 09/07/05 21:15

Hammerer wrote:
> "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> news:3o6fnlF4h3bnU3@individual.net...
>
>>Hammerer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Don M." <newsreader@nospam4fineartsnospam.com> wrote in message
>>>news:1125976943.f41c67b9237704ea6f939c7ac17f3df8@teranews...
>>
>>>>"anthonyberet" wrote in message news:3o44rmF45pa9U1@individual.net...
>>
>>>>>ooo your such a meanie...
>>>>
>>>>Hmmm. His such a meanie, yes. :)
>>>>What are you going to do about it?
>>>>
>>
>>>Yeah, anthonyberet! What about my such a meanie?
>>>Leave it out of this!
>>
>>Oh bugger, and I am so proud of my grammar too,
>>(not my extinct nans).
>>
>
>
> You're not proud of your extinct nans? That's a terrible thing to say. What
> a blow to her memory. You'll be digging her up, next, or worse.
>
>
Now you see, I read that as that I will be digging her (them - I had two
nans at one stage) up next, or worse than next.

[Back to original message]