Posted by Hammerer on 09/08/05 20:09

"Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4320978c_3@x-privat.org...
>
> "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> news:3o93jpF4m328U2@individual.net...
> >
> > Hammerer wrote:
> >
> > > "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> > > news:3o6fnlF4h3bnU3@individual.net...
> > >
> > >>Hammerer wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>"Don M." <newsreader@nospam4fineartsnospam.com> wrote in message
> > >>>news:1125976943.f41c67b9237704ea6f939c7ac17f3df8@teranews...
> > >>
> > >>>>"anthonyberet" wrote in message
news:3o44rmF45pa9U1@individual.net...
> > >>
> > >>>>>ooo your such a meanie...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Hmmm. His such a meanie, yes. :)
> > >>>>What are you going to do about it?
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >>>Yeah, anthonyberet! What about my such a meanie?
> > >>>Leave it out of this!
> > >>
> > >>Oh bugger, and I am so proud of my grammar too,
> > >>(not my extinct nans).
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > You're not proud of your extinct nans? That's a terrible thing to say.
> > > What a blow to her memory. You'll be digging her up, next, or worse.
> > >
> > >
> > Now you see, I read that as that I will be digging her (them -
> > I had two nans at one stage) up next, or worse than next.
> >
>
> You've got it! By Jove, you've got it!
>
>

Only thing is - *I* didn't "get it". I realise, now, that by posting THIS
pile of drivel :
"You'll be digging her up, next, or worse"
.. . . . What it REALLY says is that you'll have a choice of 3 people to dig
up - your nans; someone named "next"; or someone named "worse".

My brain was paralyzed by over-indulgence in Mary Lou. Still is, in fact.

[Back to original message]