|
Posted by Psyko Niko on 09/09/05 00:19
"FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> a crit dans le message de news:
1126202367.924430.140020@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Haven't seen this, but I'm wondering why (if these really are
> deliberate fakes) the industry groups haven't used them before. With
> your typical fake, the file never downloads, and bandwidth isn't overly
> taxed. With fakes like these, you're downloading worthless files and,
> once their on your system, others will attempt to DL them from you -
> which would probably affect the network as a whole.
>
That's one of the reason why I wanted to post it.
But to me, the real important thing is : I was downloading a real file, from
a real user, and "someone" found a way to "interrupt" my download.
Though I haven't seen any guy cutting the phoneline ( maybe I should have
checked by the way ), the result is about the same for that file.
--
Psyko Niko
[Back to original message]
|