|
|
Posted by Cheryl D. on 10/01/05 02:32
Loco Jones wrote:
> "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:or%_e.4141$K91.4139@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>
>>"Loco Jones" <locojonesnet@netscape.net> wrote...
>>
>>>The only thing correct in your post is that it's bottom-posted
>>>(properly) for a change. Did somebody knock you off your
>>>"King of the Hill" position?
>>>
>>>Your apparent fixation with all things "anally"-related is duly noted,
>>>you presumtuous little man. You know absolutely nothing about me.
>>>I share with my friends - surely even you can understand why that
>>>leaves you out.
>>>
>>>I'm not in the habit of filling a request for someone who has so
>
> publicly
>
>>>declared their dislike of me. If you consider the feeling is mutual,
>
> then
>
>>>why would you even ask in the first place? Is your ego that
>
> overwhelming?
>
>>>- Loco -
>>>(Now Playing: Going Nowhere - Moby Grape)
>>
>>I get lots correct and you being a twit head is just one of them.
>
>
> In your mind, Georgie, in your mind - as cramped, damp and musty a place as
> that must be.
>
>
>>Loco you are out of your league.
>
>
> What league would that be? The Hesterloli-pop League? If so, I'm just
> merely over-qualified to join.
More boasting again. You are so a legend in your own mind.
>
>
>>You are easy to bash because you are full of hot air and easily poped.
>
>
> "Easily poped" am I? Then kiss my ring - the sphincter one.
Well, Well, Well, do we now see who is the one that is REALLY
interested in men's rectums?? Why, it's LOCO JONES, of course!
>
>
>>Now pop some more you lying bastard.
>
>
> "Pop some more" what? Your self-delusional bubbles?
> Why, I'd be happy to oblige - you just keep posting, I'll continue to
> "pop"- no lies (on my part) involved.
I caught you lying already you creep. Everything you say is a lie. The
more of your post I read, the creepier you get.
>
> - Loco -
> (Now Playing: Somehow - The Vapors)
The song that fits you best- yes, it's all about you
"Walk on the wild side - Lou Reed"
>
>
[Back to original message]
|