Posted by Hammerer on 10/02/05 16:28

"George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6gT%e.17045$7b6.7819@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>
> "Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:dhothf$plk$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
> >
> > "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:p5K%e.17015$7b6.4703@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > >
> > > "Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:dhmjs6$qm5$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
> > > >
> > > > "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> top-posted
> > > > in message news:1zz%e.9626$K91.5670@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Sundio" <me@nwre.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:dhkace$p94$1@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net...
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > First thanks to all who replied to my request.
> > > > > > George, do you have a dll file for win98se ?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes but as it changes so often this one should get you going
> > > > > but you will need to find a better one I think. Here you go:
> > > > > http://home.nycap.rr.com/foryorisonly/WinMX_Patch.zip
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nice one, George. That patch (for XP systems only)
> > > > should work wonders on poor Sundio's 98SE system.
> > > > He'll really need to find a better one, I think (!snurk!).
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > It shouldn't be Hammerer.
> > >
> > It shouldn't be what?
> > >
> > > The person who made it said it was for Windows 98 specifically.
> > >
> > Please cite a source for that claim. A line in the batch file
specifically
> > says . . .
> > "*** This patch may not work correctly on Windows 95/98/ME
> > machines!" . . . Clearly, the "person" is as confused as you are.
> > >
> > > If it is not that isn't my fault. I just posted it for him
> > > never even looked at it myself.
> > >
> > There's the problem, George. Note that Sundio asked :
> > "George, do you have a dll file for win98se ?"
> > What you gave him isn't a DLL file. It's a simple batch-file.
> > Which may, or may not, work on his system. If you'd "looked
> > at it yourself", you'd have noticed.
> > >
> > > If you have problems with it I am sure we
> > > can hook you up to the writer and you can
> > > deal with them about it.
> > >
> > Don't "wriggle", dear George. Admit it . . . . you gave
> > Sundio BAD advice. YOU deal with it. No offence.
> >
> >
>
> Hammerer he did not ask for a dll.
>
Yes he did.
>
> That was his short for download.
>
No it wasn't. "dll" is DLL. Download is "dl".
>
> Now come on buddy wake up. There is no dll for this issue.
>
I assume you mean "dll" as in DLL, and not download?! Or do you? Yes there
is. For XP and NT systems. But he uses 98SE. Mind you, you're right in a
way. The idiot probably didn't know *himself* what he meant by "dll" (much
less anything else), so this crap isn't going to go anywhere without further
input from him. Be more careful in future, George!

[Back to original message]