Posted by Triffid on 01/19/51 11:28

Hammerer wrote:
> "Perseus" <ComHost-h0001.erase@hccnet.nl> wrote in message
> news:jJdEQ+hRKdmQTn1b8zcA9Dvv=Cox@4ax.com...
>
>>On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:16:32 +0100, Triffid <spamme@microsoft.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>To quote the actual last paragraph:
>>>'Some extremists still wait for the second coming of WinMX
>>>and hope it will fulfill the great promise this network once had.'
>>>Slyck was Winmx's primary advocate in the Good Old Days, and
>>>is now sounding its death knell with barely a backward glance at the
>>>efforts from many quarters to keep it alive. The article has the tone
>>>of a guy dumped by his girlfriend and hopelessly asking 'WHY?'.
>>>
>>
>>Triffid,
>>Sometimes I go over a post a little too quickly, thus missing
>>the point made. I think this is what's happened in my reading
>>your post and subsequently replying to it as I have done.
>>As I now understand it, you were actually mocking the author
>>of the article in question, were you not?
>>
>
>
> Don't keep Pers in suspense, Triffs. Were you actually mocking the author of
> the article in question, were you not?
>
>

I may have mocked, I may merely have been a little sardonic. It's hard
to tell after a good nights sleep. Google time: the reports of whose
death were exaggerated? Pay attention, there will be a test later.

[Back to original message]