Posted by Angrie.Woman on 10/09/05 20:01

-Angela- wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:49:56 +0100, "Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>"George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:X372f.33480$K91.13584@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>>
>>>"FinnTroll" <yab@roll.uc> wrote in message
>>>news:rL42f.147996$dP1.505605@newsc.telia.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>I mean, we've been discussing different methods that the
>>>>RIAA uses to affect the WinMX communion and maybe
>>>>that by keeping these videos in my share I can be able to
>>>>sort of out those RIAA and put their IP in the "hall of shame"-hosts
>>
>>file :-)
>>
>>>Not sure what you mean by the "hall of shame"-hosts file.
>>>The hosts is a redirector that is used only when you fire up
>>>the client and connect or lose your host. After that it is not used.
>>>
>>
>>Yes, George. But it's used when, as you say, you fire up the client and
>>connect. What Finntroll is saying is that he could theoretically enter any
>>offending IP's into his Hosts file and presumably redirect them to 127.0.0.1
>>(the localhost) so that the next time he connects THEY wouldn't be able to.
>>To be honest, he'd be better off using PeerGuardian, or entering them
>>directly into his firewall. Of course, there's always anti-leeching tools.
>>Hi, George!
>>
>
>
> You're not so terrible Hammerer !! This is a post for the record,
> one to write home about, no, one to *call* home about !! Yes! that's
> what I did. What?-- *You* giving a senseable, straight-forward,
> 'might just be right' reply??? and even to George Hester !! I
> thought he was your favorite person to mis-lead down the stairway of
> doom. Your reputation is on the line here now I guess you know. I
> have been lurking here for a spell and this just shocked the shite out
> of me. Come clean- you're *really* a nice guy aren't you? Forget
> it, you'd never admit to that eh? ;o)

You want him.

A

[Back to original message]