Posted by speeder on 10/11/05 02:10

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:28:02 GMT, "George Hester"
<hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Speeder I really do not care what you think I sound like.

That's good for you, George because I really don't know what to think
of you at times.

>Fact is the WinMX
>has performed poorly all day. And getting connected problems is NOT what I
>have been saying.

Not you, George, but maybe others? (hint, hint). With the peer cache
server instability, you can't expect everyone to keep up.

>There are other issues which you may have addressed as
>Network instability and lack of peers. Of course you could have said that
>at anytime.

But I did say it, George, please listen instead of trying to make what
I think of you.

>I have never experienced this level of bullshit in WinMX prior
>to the Big Squeeze. Never. Lack of peers is likely true but then why?

Why? Something to do with the "Big Squeeze" maybe?

>Getting connected is only half the problem.

Yes! Right on the money you are, George! It's not called peer-to-peer
for nothing.

Tell ya what. If you still think your problem is due to fake peer
cache servers, you post here their IPs. That way we can all take a
closer look and verify your accusations.

[Back to original message]