Posted by George Hester on 10/11/05 11:55

"speeder" <no.spam@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:bc5mk1dgl4afsb4k7sq8lkl17cesjq38as@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:28:02 GMT, "George Hester"
> <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Speeder I really do not care what you think I sound like.
>
> That's good for you, George because I really don't know what to think
> of you at times.
>
> >Fact is the WinMX
> >has performed poorly all day. And getting connected problems is NOT what
I
> >have been saying.
>
> Not you, George, but maybe others? (hint, hint). With the peer cache
> server instability, you can't expect everyone to keep up.
>
> >There are other issues which you may have addressed as
> >Network instability and lack of peers. Of course you could have said
that
> >at anytime.
>
> But I did say it, George, please listen instead of trying to make what
> I think of you.
>
> >I have never experienced this level of bullshit in WinMX prior
> >to the Big Squeeze. Never. Lack of peers is likely true but then why?
>
> Why? Something to do with the "Big Squeeze" maybe?
>
> >Getting connected is only half the problem.
>
> Yes! Right on the money you are, George! It's not called peer-to-peer
> for nothing.
>
> Tell ya what. If you still think your problem is due to fake peer
> cache servers, you post here their IPs. That way we can all take a
> closer look and verify your accusations.

Sure I have one. Here:

209.67.209.50

That is in the hosts that are coming out of vladd. Why? It doesn't exist.

--

George Hester
_________________________________

[Back to original message]