Posted by db on 10/11/05 13:16

"George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hLN2f.38414$7b6.31900@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> "speeder" <no.spam@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:bc5mk1dgl4afsb4k7sq8lkl17cesjq38as@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:28:02 GMT, "George Hester"
>> <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Speeder I really do not care what you think I sound like.
>>
>> That's good for you, George because I really don't know what to think
>> of you at times.
>>
>> >Fact is the WinMX
>> >has performed poorly all day. And getting connected problems is NOT
>> >what
> I
>> >have been saying.
>>
>> Not you, George, but maybe others? (hint, hint). With the peer cache
>> server instability, you can't expect everyone to keep up.
>>
>> >There are other issues which you may have addressed as
>> >Network instability and lack of peers. Of course you could have said
> that
>> >at anytime.
>>
>> But I did say it, George, please listen instead of trying to make what
>> I think of you.
>>
>> >I have never experienced this level of bullshit in WinMX prior
>> >to the Big Squeeze. Never. Lack of peers is likely true but then why?
>>
>> Why? Something to do with the "Big Squeeze" maybe?
>>
>> >Getting connected is only half the problem.
>>
>> Yes! Right on the money you are, George! It's not called peer-to-peer
>> for nothing.
>>
>> Tell ya what. If you still think your problem is due to fake peer
>> cache servers, you post here their IPs. That way we can all take a
>> closer look and verify your accusations.
>
> Sure I have one. Here:
>
> 209.67.209.50
>
> That is in the hosts that are coming out of vladd. Why? It doesn't
> exist.
>
> --
>
> George Hester
> _________________________________

Look in your host file.

[Back to original message]