Posted by Sammy on 09/09/05 19:49

In article <slrndi1s3v.cah.aznomad@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net>,
AZ Nomad <aznomad@PmunOgeBOX.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 17:23:39 -0700, Sammy <sammy@xxx.invalid> wrote:
> >Probably so. But I now believe that by the time these companies come
> >out with dual format players, it will be too late. The format war
> >will make high definition DVDs stillborn. If the dual format players
> >appeared the same day high def DVDs premiered, it might have a
> >chance. But mid or late 2006 will be too late. Hollywood really blew
> >it by not backing a single format.
>
> Yeah, just like CDs never caught on becaue players where originaly
> over a thousand dollars and still over $500 two years later.
>
> Oh, wait a minute; that didn't happen. Just like how in 2010 nobody
> will care that dual format players didn't appear until late 2006.

Huh? Are you as stupid as comrade trotsky? Take a remedial reading
course. Read what I said. Did I ever refer to cost as an issue? My
comments did not mention cost and had nothing to do with cost. Did you
read this and compose your response while on a delayed delusional acid
trip. I'd try to explain my point to you, but why waste time talking to
an airhead?

[Back to original message]