Posted by George Hester on 01/21/21 11:30

"db" <@ .> wrote in message
news:4361419a$0$73616$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net...
>
> "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> news:3scpk3FnlntfU1@individual.net...
> > George Hester wrote:
> >> "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> >> news:3s7pdqFmvoanU2@individual.net...
> >>
> >>>Don Wiss wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 13:05:44 +0100, anthonyberet <nospam@me.invalid>
<snip>
> Oh my, anyone remember this?;
> http://www.nodata.plus.com/stuff/incompletes.htm
>
> :o

Nice article db. It seems there are pros and cons to this issue as anything
else. I can understand the arguments on both sides. Of course I do not
agree with the arguments presented for the sharing of INCOMPLETES and in
fact thought similarly to what Anthony has been espousing. But when I found
out that traders were not going to trade with me with partials in my shares
I quickly realized that reason was convincing enough.

--

George Hester
_________________________________

[Back to original message]