Posted by kim on 01/20/10 11:31

"Paul Blay" <ask_me_or_get_spam_trapped@saotome.demon.co.uk> wrote in
message news:dkqm9o$ee7$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk...
> "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:dkqli1$33p$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
>> A new user is unlikely to associate that particular link with a working
>> version of the program. He would assume the version on offer was
>> out-of-date.
>
> Then I guess they would have had to take the extra two seconds to look
> at the third link. "PCWorld.com - WinMX v3.53"

It's a dead link as are many of the others which follow. By that time most
newbies will have concluded that WinMX no longer exists.

(kim)

[Back to original message]