Posted by Johnny on 11/16/05 21:31

A bit of extreme artistic licence being used in the interpretation there,
methinks!
The stuff I have been listening to, referred to earlier in this thread, is
unmistakable.


"anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
news:3tvbngFugrm7U1@individual.net...
> Johnny wrote:
>> Is there any way to fiddle around with, or play backwards a digital
>> recording so that you can understand the backtrack that was put on the
>> original LP?
>> Cheers.
> Here is a good backmasking site:
> http://jeffmilner.com/backmasking.htm

[Back to original message]