Posted by Don M. on 11/26/05 07:54

"anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message news:3uoaunF1269fjU1@individual.net...
> Don M. wrote:
> > "anthonyberet" wrote in message news:3uhkegF113tkrU1@individual.net...
> >>Hammerer wrote:
> >>>"Don M." wrote in message news:T6OdncBcOMPNnx_eRVnytg@giganews.com...
> >>>>"Hammerer" wrote in message news:4381f3f0_3@x-privat.org...
> >>>>
> >>>>>Thanks for settling all that. So what happened? Are you sure it was you?
> >>>>
> >>>>I'm prrrretty sure it was him... after getting very merry at the local pub. From
> >>>>what I understand, and tony can correct me if I'm wrong, he doesn't sit by his
> >>>>computer all day or night, 24/7 and all that. He was probably in the middle of
> >>>>his other exciting thing of the day while typing with his toes, coma toes.
> >>>>
> >>>All in all, I'd say it was the "they then all spend time retrying each-other
> >>>for ages" bit that's most interesting. It was a good finish, whilst at the
> >>>same time sounding REALLY dirty. He's forgiven.
> >>>
> >>cor! - I'd like to retry a couple of people for ages...
> >
> > Yours a really strange wish. Disturbing, in a disgusting, dirty, sort of way.
> > Which ages are you talking about, I'm afraid to ask. Ok, ok, I don't want to hear the
> > answer.
> >
> Yes, that was a filthy, perved joke. How can I ever apologise?
> (Incidentally, I did mean 'ages' in the original sense of 'a long time',
> but your reply would have been worthy of Hammerer ;)
===========

Now, now. There was no need for you to offend Hammerer, was there...


Don

[Back to original message]