Reply to Re: WinMX has encountered a problem and must close

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Darkstar on 12/19/05 20:55

"Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43a6f7f0_2@x-privat.org...
>
> "Darkstar" <someone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:lWApf.6992$3Z.811@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>>
>> "Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:43a60aff_3@x-privat.org...
>> >
>> > Still can't get WinMX to work, Fartstar??!! The times they
>> > *aren't* a changin', eh?!
>> >
>>
>> C'mon now Spammerer, I've come to expect a much
>> better response from you.
>>
> All part of the plan, Fartsprat! You see, I often like to give much less
> better responses from me just to see if people answer with something inane
> like "I've come to expect a much better response from you". You did!
>>
>> You're nearly as rusty as last year's penny nail.
>>
> Hey! Maybe it's because I've less and less people to insult with my
> superior
> blend of sarcasm and derision! Yes! Still; you'll do just fine.
>>
>> Must be because you've less and less people to insult
>> with your superior blend of sarcasm and derision.
>>
> That's what *I* just said! Must be painful for you, though. Think about
> it.
> If it wasn't for me, you wouldn't post to this group, as you "use another
> concept" (snigger!).
>>
>> WinMx still works fine for me.
>>
> {snrrkkff} ....... yes; I'm sure it does, Dankrats!
>>
>> Just not this incarnation. I use another concept.
>>
> Kazaa?
>>
>> Thanks for asking.
>>
> No problem. I thought you'd appreciate the attention. Always happy to
> help.
>
All in all, a much better effort, Spammerer. When I saw your original post,
my initial thought was that an imposter was posting to this group,
pretending to be Spammerer. This latest barrage of your verbal vomit was
much more akin to the caliber of spew that we've all come to expect from you
on your better days. Nice job! I'm glad you haven't slipped a rung on the
proverbial ladder.

> If it wasn't for me, you wouldn't post to this group, as you "use another
> concept" (snigger!).
What you meant to say here was "If it weren't for me, you wouldn't post to
this group. "Wasn't" is not the correct usage here. That's alright though
usage and grammar doesn't matter on Usenet.

As far as my referencing other "concepts" That was bad terminology on my
part. I think communication is better served if I write that I use a
different version of WinMX, as the program is still WinMx. It's just a
different version than the one most people here use. It does not require
editing of host files, or even keeping up with changes, for that matter.
Downloads are easy, queues are small and the quality is quite good.
Conversely, I am still quite curious though, how other versions are working,
or not, so I continue to monitor this group. I never tire of your insights
and witticisms mate. Frankly, they continue to be rather compelling. I mean
it's hard to top a quip like
"{snrrkkff} ....... yes; I'm sure it does, Dankrats!"
Nice stuff. How literary ! Keep up the good work and Happy Christmas to you
and yours. My best to your Mum, Mate. I hope 2006 is the year that you
finally can move out of her dank, musty basement and into your own flat.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"