Posted by Hammerer on 12/19/05 23:30

"Darkstar" <someone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:47Fpf.7563$Dd2.5261@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
> "Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:43a6f7f0_2@x-privat.org...
> >
> > "Darkstar" <someone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > news:lWApf.6992$3Z.811@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> >>
> >> "Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:43a60aff_3@x-privat.org...
> >> >
> >> > Still can't get WinMX to work, Fartstar??!! The times
> >> > they *aren't* a changin', eh?!
> >> >
> >>
> >> C'mon now Spammerer, I've come to expect
> >> a much better response from you.
> >>
>
> > All part of the plan, Fartsprat! You see, I often like to give much less
> > better responses from me just to see if people answer with something
inane
> > like "I've come to expect a much better response from you". You did!
> >>
>
> >> You're nearly as rusty as last year's penny nail.
> >>
>
> > Hey! Maybe it's because I've less and less people to insult
> > with my superior blend of sarcasm and derision! Yes! Still;
> > you'll do just fine.
> >>
>
> >> Must be because you've less and less people to insult
> >> with your superior blend of sarcasm and derision.
> >>
>
> > That's what *I* just said! Must be painful for you, though.
> > Think about it. If it wasn't for me, you wouldn't post to this
> > group, as you "use another concept" (snigger!).
> >>
>
> >> WinMx still works fine for me.
> >>
>
> > {snrrkkff} ....... yes; I'm sure it does, Dankrats!
> >>
>
> >> Just not this incarnation. I use another concept.
> >>
>
> > Kazaa?
> >>
>
> >> Thanks for asking.
> >>
>
> > No problem. I thought you'd appreciate the attention.
> > Always happy to help.
> >
>
> All in all, a much better effort, Spammerer. When I saw your
> original post, my initial thought was that an imposter was posting
> to this group, pretending to be Spammerer.
>
Are you positive? Tell the truth. Your initial thought, surely, was to dive
straight in with a top-posted, rage-filled outburst with weak
capitalization, the phrase "shut the lights", and ending with "ok? hey
thanks". And you did it! Was the drool on your chin wiped before, or after
the post? Hey - just teasin'!
>
> This latest barrage of your verbal vomit was much more akin
> to the caliber of spew that we've all come to expect from you
> on your better days. Nice job! I'm glad you haven't slipped a
> rung on the proverbial ladder.
>
Thanks! That's the kind of respect I don't see much, here. And if I want to
know anything about proverbial slips on proverbial ladders - you're the guy
to ask, Kackfart!
>
> > If it wasn't for me, you wouldn't post to this group, as you
> > "use another concept" (snigger!).
> >
>
> What you meant to say here was "If it weren't for me, you wouldn't
> post to this group. "Wasn't" is not the correct usage here. That's
> alright though usage and grammar doesn't matter on Usenet.
>
And that's a damn good thing as far as I'm concerned, Fartnuts! Nothing gets
my goat more than guys who point out grammatical errors, and all that stuff,
apart from those who write like shite! It's a sin!
>
> As far as my referencing other "concepts" That was bad
> terminology on my part.
>
Naahh. Naaaahhhhh!!! I'm sure I was the only one who thought you used Kazaa.
Everyone else probably thought you knew how to get WinMX to work. Relax.

> I think communication is better served if I write that I use a
> different version of WinMX, as the program is still WinMx. It's just a
> different version than the one most people here use. It does not require
> editing of host files, or even keeping up with changes, for that matter.
> Downloads are easy, queues are small and the quality is quite good.
>
Look - I believe you. OK?
>
> Conversely, I am still quite curious though, how other versions
> are working, or not, so I continue to monitor this group.
>
Yes. Your WinMX-related posts on this group are a breath of fresh air ......
compared to the sort of things *I* post, I mean! You're a hero!
>
> I never tire of your insights and witticisms mate. Frankly,
> they continue to be rather compelling.
>
Yes. I think that fact has been firmly established by now. I'm flattered. I
have to say, though, that it makes you seem a little . . . . well . . . .
"crazed". Just slightly. No offence.
>
> I mean it's hard to top a quip like
> "{snrrkkff} ....... yes; I'm sure it does, Dankrats!"
>
I kinda liked it myself. Thanks! Hey - why not finish with some desperately
unoriginal "mother"-style quip, or something??!! You know you want to!
>
> Nice stuff. How literary ! Keep up the good work and Happy
> Christmas to you and yours. My best to your Mum, Mate. I hope
> 2006 is the year that you finally can move out of her dank, musty
> basement and into your own flat.
>
Yaaaaaayyy!!!

[Back to original message]