Posted by Hammerer on 01/02/06 02:05

"anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
news:41r87tF1fkkpdU1@individual.net...
>
> Hammerer wrote:
>
> > "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:41ps9nF1fog8fU1@individual.net...
> >
> >>Anonymous wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Now that WinMX is a corpse - it has ceased to be! - why don't
> >>>you morons treat yourselves to a #real# P2P treat - BitTorrent!
> >>>Why do this to yourselves? Why keep patching up that old crap
> >>>you insist on using? It's shit!
> >>>So use BitTorrent. It's much better than WinMX, which is shit.
> >>>Did I mention that WinMX is shit?
> >>>
> >>
> >>Running Winmx is like running a classic car.
> >>
> >
> >
> > It needs lots of maintenance; spare parts are expensive;
> > handles like a beached whale; and you'd really be better
> > off using something a bit more "practical"?
> >
>
> Well....yes.
>
I'm shocked, anthonyberet! A regular on the 'alt.music.mp3.winmx' group
disrespecting WinMX like that - it's shocking!
>
> I can't say that I use winmx for convenience anymore.
> - Although if tuned-up and handled properly it does do the job very
> well, and like a classic car, it performs in an aesthetcally pleasing way.
>
Yes. The question is, though, will WinMX ever attain the stature of "penis
symbol" like some of those classic cars apparently do? The way it's
downsizing at the moment, I seriously doubt it. It's like the original troll
said - BitTorrent seems to be getting its leg over WinMX just now. Giving it
a proper shafting.
>
> > Ha Ha - just teasing, anthonyberet!
> > You guys! Hook, line, and sinker! Honestly!
> >
>
> Yes again. However, I couldn't be bothered to not answer this troll.
>
Understood. I though it was kind of sweet, myself.

[Back to original message]