Reply to Re: Another RIAA case defended on basis that no downloads proved
Posted by FatKat on 09/13/05 22:28
This isn't the ruling - just the defendant's answer. From the looks of
things, the reply shotguns a bunch of boilerplate legal/equitable rules
(laches, statutes of limitations, dirty hands) and denials. My guess
is that there is probably a model .pdf reply floating around somewhere,
and this is one of them.