Posted by Trish on 11/15/14 11:27

"Om_Audio" <clifsound@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1K-dnY-R5uQwoKjeRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> Thanks- works great- nice!
>
How exactly did you do it. I have clicked on the link given, but can't see
where to go from there. Thanks for any help.
> o
>
> "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> news:3pkrd9Faq1faU1@individual.net...
>> Here is the link.
>>
>> http://www.winmxworld.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=419
>>
>> I always thought the winmx community was a strong one, but I have been
>> amazed at how quickly these workarounds have appeared since the official
>> winmx cache servers were taken offline.
>>
>> I do wonder however, as there seem to be two different host patches going
>> around, if there are now two (or more) separate winmx networks?
>>
>> The one I am on does seem to be functioning well - I have more secondary
>> connections than usual, but the quality of the files turning up in
>> searches looks very good.
>>
>> I suppose the need for a patch will reduce the userbase, but the more
>> motivated members of the community will remain, so at the moment at
>> least, the winmx network looks more healthy than it has for a while.
>>
>> -There do seem to still be spoofed files for some titles - but now there
>> is more chance of the sources being blocked centrally once the network is
>> stable.
>>
>> I look forward to seeing how all this develops.
>
>

[Back to original message]