Posted by George Hester on 09/25/05 21:13

"Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4336de11_3@x-privat.org...
>
> "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> missed it all, again,
> in message news:DNAZe.4992$Xl2.487@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> >
> > First I want to get something straight.
> >
> Sure, George. Feel free. Remember to 'wipe off' when you're finished.
> Cleanliness is next to Godliness, apparently.
> >
> > Why are you making sense?
> >
> Thanks for the thumbs-up, George. And I'm not being sexy in saying that,
or
> anything. No.
> >
> > What happened to you Hammerer?
> > Not like you at all. This network issue
> > must have dampened your enthusiasm.
> >
> The mouth speaks; the eyes see; but Mr. Brain has long since ceased to
> function . . . . eh, George?!
> >
> > If it was an attack the losing side would have been non-existant.
> > Since the developers of the P2P still do exist it wasn't an attack.
> > Only a threat. But then so what? The result was nearly the same.
> > I'm sure the P2P folks wouldn't quibble whether it was an attack
> > or a threat. To them they still have their wallet which is what
matters.
> > If it was a true attack they wouldn't have wallets either.
> >
> Yes. It's been mentioned before, I think, George . . . . how 'thick' your
> skin is, I mean. You are - definitely - the 'Iron Man' of Usenet,
impervious
> to any, and all, forms of sarcasm, devilish trollery, teasing, and
> jocularity. I suppose it's commendable, in a way. A true 'innocent'.
George
> . . . . you're a rare guy, and no mistake!!! Respect!
>
>

Yes it has been mentioned before. Good or bad who knows. I do listen
though. This bottom posting is all for ya'll. Personally I despise it.
But I try to keep the flames to a minimum when I can.

--
George Hester
_________________________________

[Back to original message]