Posted by Joel on 10/07/05 00:41

"audiohead" <magnel709j@earthlink.net> wrote:

>> I got my GED 10 years ago, and went to college for a year and a half.
>> I suspect that is a far greater education than you will ever obtain.
>
>A whole year and a half. I can't stop laughing....Was this year and a
>half at the same GED college?

That makes no sense, you idiot. I notice you imply that you never
went to college at all, though, since you failed to mention it. I was
right, you uneducated buffoon.

>> Dude, the source is 44.1. Encoding an MP3 at a higher sample rate
>> would be stupid, period.
>
>See above "stupid." Where's the relevance?...unless your post GED
>education (still laughing) has somehow given you the miraculous
>perceptual ability to distinguish between 44.1 and 48.

That's irrelevant, you reject. If the source is 44.1, encoding with
48 would be wasteful. You do realize that the resulting files would
be different, right?

>> Have you ever actually used Hymn? It's very straightforward. Why the
>> fuck would I burn audio CDs, only to waste time and effort, and not
>> end up with the same quality once I reencoded them to MP3? I'd rather
>> have an unprotected, original M4A. Duh.
>>
>I guess you have way too much time on your hands [suggestion - try a
>hands free browser next time so you can continue to play with yourself
>while posting this irrelevant post GED garbage]

You're an idiot. I have bought files from iTunes, so I was more than
pleased to take the "time" to learn Hymn, which is very simple. But I
guess you non-high-school-graduates can't figure it out.

> The newer iPods will
>not authorize "hymned" .m4a which means additional workarounds are
>needed.

I don't own, nor do I desire to own a fucking iPod, retard. Weasel
out of your stupidity some other way.

> And, "Duh" Who wouln't rather have unprotected .m4a's. They
>sound better than mp3.

Now you're getting it.

>Suggestion: Seriously, have an individually administered IQ test
>completed so we can all know what level of intellectual impairment you
>have. Hint: Look up the code 318.2. No codec needed.

My IQ is quite high.

--
Joel Crump

"Of course, it is ironic that a media company [Fox News Channel] that
should be seeking to protect the First Amendment is seeking to
undermine it by claiming a monopoly on the phrase 'fair and balanced.'"
- Judge Denny Chin, referring to Fox News accusing Al Franken of
trademark infringement.

[Back to original message]