Posted by Joel on 10/07/05 16:11

"audiohead" <magnel709j@earthlink.net> wrote:

>> That makes no sense, you idiot. I notice you imply that you never
>> went to college at all, though, since you failed to mention it. I was
>>right, you uneducated buffoon.
>
>This is the best laugh I've had all week. Thanks. Actually, I have more
>education and make more money than you could ever hope of obtaining in
>ten of your pathetic lifetimes.

I don't believe you, liar.

>> That's irrelevant, you reject. If the source is 44.1, encoding with
>> 48 would be wasteful. You do realize that the resulting files would
>> be different, right?
>
>Did you notice the rest of the input settings in the example given?

They're irrelevant.

>Obviously not. You really are a stupid SOB.
>Please do us all a favor and go back to your incestuous upbringing of
>tuning banjo's on your grandmother's porch, you fucking ignorant
>hillbilly.

<yawn>

>> You're an idiot. I have bought files from iTunes, so I was more than
>> pleased to take the "time" to learn Hymn, which is very simple. But I
>> guess you non-high-school-graduates can't figure it out.
>
>If you don't own an iPod why would you download protected AAC?

Because I wanted to buy the music! Duh! iTunes is better than the
WMA sites.

>> I don't own, nor do I desire to own a fucking iPod, retard. Weasel
>> out of your stupidity some other way.
>
>You don't own very much of anything do you?

I own plenty.

> ["out of your stupidity
>some other way?????"] You really should consider taking a remedial
>English class.

I'm sorry if you're too illiterate to comprehend what I wrote. Go
back to high school.

>Furthermore, I guess only fucking ignorant hillbillies like you would
>download protected AAC files just for the sake of learning Hymn.

???

>> Now you're getting it.
>
>The original question concerned i-Tunes mp3's. Get it?

No, it concerned iTunes' protected files.

>> My IQ is quite high.
>
>I'm sure it is...for an ignorant, banjo playing hillbilly.

<yawn>

--
Joel Crump

"Of course, it is ironic that a media company [Fox News Channel] that
should be seeking to protect the First Amendment is seeking to
undermine it by claiming a monopoly on the phrase 'fair and balanced.'"
- Judge Denny Chin, referring to Fox News accusing Al Franken of
trademark infringement.

[Back to original message]