Posted by fukeneh on 10/10/05 18:55

NRen2k5 wrote:
> On 9/24/2005 1:51:53 PM, "George Hester" wrote:
> >"Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:43358cb6_2@x-privat.org...
> >>
> >> "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:z_fZe.2102$7b6.670@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> >> >
> >> > As far as I know RIAA "attcked" nothing. Their lawyers put the
> >> > fear of God into P2P developers. That was all it took. The loss
> >> > in Network as a direct response to RIAA lawyer threats. That is it.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yes, George. Otherwise known as an RIAA "attck".
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I suppose. But if the P2P developers didn't get cold feet the RIAA "attack"
> >would have been useless. Wasn't an "attack" it was a "threat." There is a
> >diference. We threatened Iraq and then we attacked them. I spz we could
> >have just attacked them but then people would say it wasn't a "Just" war.
> >The threat made it Just.
> >
> >--
> >George Hester
> >_________________________________
> >
> >
>
> The threat of war if they didn't destroy *the WMD which they didn't have*... ? ;)
>
> - NRen2k5

[Back to original message]