Posted by audiohead on 10/26/05 09:37

Joel wrote:
> "audiohead" <magnel709j@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >dadiOH wrote:
> >>
> >> > You have to convert to CDA (CD audio track)
> >>
> >> aka "wave"
> >
> >"aka wave"?? CDA (CD audio track) is not even a file format until
> >it's encoded to WAV. CDA is used for encoding music on commercial
> >CD's. You're converting CDA files to another format when storing on a
> >PC's hard drive. You obviously don't know the difference.
>
> The only difference is in the formatting. The data is exactly the
> same.


You need a file extension for playback moron.


>
> >> > before encoding to WAV format.
> >>
> >> One does not "encode" wave...it is what was on the CD, no change other
> >> than a header.
> >> IOW, "CDA" <> WAVE.
> >
> >Again, for storage on a windows PC an encoding from CDA to WAV is
> >necessary, which now contains chunks of information, including PCM,
> >that the original CDA didn't have.
>
> Not.

For playback asswipe.

>
> >> > Besides converting a lossy
> >> > DRM WMA to WAV is not a good suggestion.
> >>
> >> Why not? That is exactly what is done everytime it is played. However,
> >> there is no "conversion", merely decoding.
> >
> >It's not a good suggestion because Malcolm is using a Squeezebox. You
> >can't "squeeze" too many WAV's into a Squeezebox. You obviously
> >haven't even read the original post, and are only interested in
> >irrelevant rebuttal to which you know nothing about.
>
> Nice try.
>
> >Do us all a favor and redo your amateurish website, take your ADHD
> >medication, and find a forum for vinyl and cassette relics.
>
> Take your schizophrenia medication.

Have you ordered you new teeth yet Hillbilly? I see you're playing it
safe and keeping your responses down to one or two words. Seriously,
take a remedial English class so you can actually response in complete
sentences.
>
> --
> Joel Crump
>
> "Of course, it is ironic that a media company [Fox News Channel] that
> should be seeking to protect the First Amendment is seeking to
> undermine it by claiming a monopoly on the phrase 'fair and balanced.'"
> - Judge Denny Chin, referring to Fox News accusing Al Franken of
> trademark infringement.

[Back to original message]