Posted by CQ on 11/15/76 11:30

In article <1sCdnUg6AfCHCcLeRVnyvg@pipex.net>, Keith G said...

> Three, counting you,

I regret the "arrogant fool" comment. I should have left it "arrogant
asshole" as I originally wrote it.

> but I haven't really been paying close attention...

No. That seems to be a problem for you. Too self involved, perhaps?

> Why do you think the only one
> > (audiohead) that is actually silly or a little boy would care whether or
> > not he bothers you and your group?
>
>
> No, beats me -

No? You can't answer that question with a yes or no. Without a comma
after the "why" its answer requires an opinion. Is that sort of thing as
much trouble for you as paying close attention is?

> you'll have to tell me....

I asked you about what you think. Do you often have to ask others to
tell you what it is you think and why you think those things?

> The ONLY reason he posts to the amm
> > group is to bother the people here.
>
>
> That much is obvious,

Yet you seemed to have missed it until it was pointed out to you. More
of that "not paying close attention" problem?

> as is the fact that there seem to be plenty of people
> in amm who are equally silly enough to respond to him....

Actually there only seem to be two people here who bother with him
anymore. Why they do is beyond me but neither of them are silly little
boys, no matter what an attention deprived self involved pompous little
pedant like yourself has to say. A simple "please remove the xpost"
would have had much more chance of success with them than your gratuitous
and condescending attempts at insult.

> > Nice job though. You have called his attention to the fact that he is
> > now bothering those in another group and he may well take to bothering
> > you and have less time in his, err, busy life for bothering the
> > contributors to this group.
>
>
> Or I have called his attention to the fact that he is also making himself
> look a tit to people not subscribing to his 'own' group...???

Oh yes. And the two people who are answering him here, what exactly do
you think THEY are doing when they answer him? Inviting him over for a
beer? The guy isn't going to be any more impressed by you calling him a
"tit" than he is by anyone else pointing out what an ass he is, no matter
what you think of your ability to apply withering insult at whim.

He is actually so stupid that he will not understand that the word "tit"
as you use it is different from the American slang that he knows which is
the only thing his limited range of intelligence allows him awareness of.

He'll think you are saying he looks like a woman's breast.

> > Thank you.
>
> My pleasure... :-)
>
> (Crossposting left in intentionally...)

Well at least you were paying attention to something.

You came here whining about crossposting of a silly thread and slinging
gratuitous insults at people you do not know, even descending to the
amazingly puerile tactic of making fun of a person's name, yet now, when
you have been replied to in kind, you feel it is alright for you to
crosspost and perpetuate the same thread. We can add hypocrite to the
short list of attributes you have demonstrated in your short time in the
amm group.

--
CQ

[Back to original message]