Posted by Keith G on 11/15/38 11:30

"CQ" <me@privacy.com> wrote in message
news:1130408168.dd4cb1e886ba7290f6469d3932942235@bubbanews...
> In article <1sCdnUg6AfCHCcLeRVnyvg@pipex.net>, Keith G said...
>
>> Three, counting you,
>
> I regret the "arrogant fool" comment. I should have left it "arrogant
> asshole" as I originally wrote it.


OK, it's lunchtime, I'll play.... :-)

Btw, that'd be *arsehole* in ukra....

>
>> but I haven't really been paying close attention...
>
> No. That seems to be a problem for you. Too self involved, perhaps?


Possibly. Who knows/cares/gives a shit...???

>
>> Why do you think the only one
>> > (audiohead) that is actually silly or a little boy would care whether
>> > or
>> > not he bothers you and your group?
>>
>>
>> No, beats me -
>
> No? You can't answer that question with a yes or no.


Correct, it's difficult to answer a 'why' question with either one, I
find....


Without a comma
> after the "why" its answer requires an opinion.


Requires? Like I'm *obliged* to provide you with one or summat??

(Do I get to invoice you if I do??)


Is that sort of thing as
> much trouble for you as paying close attention is?


I don't pay any attention to cross-posted threads normally, it's just that
yours had gone on and on and on....

>
>> you'll have to tell me....


So I do get to invoice you then? Simple yes or no will do - seeing as you
are so fond of yes or no answers...


>
> I asked you about what you think. Do you often have to ask others to
> tell you what it is you think and why you think those things?


All the time - and why I've gone into certain rooms at times and WTF it was
that I was looking for when I had gone into those rooms...

I also lose teaspoons...


>
>> The ONLY reason he posts to the amm
>> > group is to bother the people here.
>>
>>
>> That much is obvious,
>
> Yet you seemed to have missed it until it was pointed out to you. More
> of that "not paying close attention" problem?



I guess....

<shrug>

>
>> as is the fact that there seem to be plenty of people
>> in amm who are equally silly enough to respond to him....
>
> Actually there only seem to be two people here who bother with him
> anymore.


Did I ask?


Why they do is beyond me but neither of them are silly little
> boys,


Do I care?


no matter what an attention deprived self involved pompous little
> pedant like yourself has to say.


Your punctuation has gone to shit as well - are you an American?


A simple "please remove the xpost"


"Yes, that always works."


> would have had much more chance of success with them than your gratuitous
> and condescending attempts at insult.


Yebbut, where's the fun in that? :-)


>
>> > Nice job though. You have called his attention to the fact that he is
>> > now bothering those in another group and he may well take to bothering
>> > you and have less time in his, err, busy life for bothering the
>> > contributors to this group.
>>
>>
>> Or I have called his attention to the fact that he is also making himself
>> look a tit to people not subscribing to his 'own' group...???
>
> Oh yes. And the two people who are answering him here, what exactly do
> you think THEY are doing when they answer him? Inviting him over for a
> beer? The guy isn't going to be any more impressed by you calling him a
> "tit" than he is by anyone else pointing out what an ass he is, no matter
> what you think of your ability to apply withering insult at whim.
>
> He is actually so stupid that he will not understand that the word "tit"


You've said 'tit' twice now - do you like that word?


> as you use it is different from the American slang that he knows which is
> the only thing his limited range of intelligence allows him awareness of.


If Yanks leak into UK newgroups they get UK currency - it's hard, but it's
the way of the world....


>
> He'll think you are saying he looks like a woman's breast.


There you go again!

(I think you're enjoying this! :-)


>
>> > Thank you.
>>
>> My pleasure... :-)
>>
>> (Crossposting left in intentionally...)
>
> Well at least you were paying attention to something.


Go on, what was that then?


>
> You came here whining


I think you're the one doing the *whining* moi beauty... ;-)


about crossposting of a silly thread and slinging
> gratuitous insults at people you do not know, even descending to the
> amazingly puerile tactic of making fun of a person's name,


It's a terrible name - sounds like a low-speed traffic accident.

OTOH, if it is his real name, it shows he's got gut and doesn't hide behind
summay tossy like 'CQ'....


yet now, when
> you have been replied to in kind, you feel it is alright for you to
> crosspost and perpetuate the same thread.


Fuckin' terrible ain't I?? ;-)


We can add hypocrite to the
> short list of attributes you have demonstrated in your short time in the
> amm group.

Go on then, why not if it makes you happy...?? :-)

You'll have to excuse me now - me tea's cooled down a bit!

Ciao...

[Back to original message]