Posted by NRen2k5 on 11/16/05 01:00

Maybe, maybe not. I'm not an Audition expert.

Well, if you use LAME or some other commandline decoder to decode the
MP3 to WAV, the WAV you get should have exactly the same content as the
MP3, and you can check the WAV in Audition.

- NRen2k5

blum100@comcast.net wrote:
> On 15 Nov 2005 12:23:53 GMT, "fred-bloggs"
> <fred-bloggs@hahahotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>blum100@comcast.net wrote in news:rmain1177mjocrls0pgodckbngqho0sm9c@
>>4ax.com:
>>
>>
>>>I noticed something odd while converting some Wavs to Mp3s (192) for
>>>emailing. When I played the converted MP3 on Winamp, the EQ bars
>>>showed more high end than the original Wav.No other EQing was done
>>>just a straight conversion fromMS PCM Wav to Mp3. I thought the wav
>>>was lossless as opposed to the Mp3. What's up with that? Anyone?
>>>Jay
>>
>>Do you HEAR more *top*? I wouldn't trust WinAmp.
>>Load the mp3 back into Audition and do a frequency analysis on it.
>>
>>If indeed there is more top, try a different mp3 encoder
>>Lame 3.97 beta
>>http://www.rarewares.org/dancer/dancer.php?f=3
>
> I loaded the wav and then the mp3 back to audition for a frequency
> analysis and the mp3 came up with a blank window, the wav showed the
> frequencies. Do I need to do something to make the mp3 frequencies
> appear?
> Jay

[Back to original message]