Posted by Michelle Steiner on 01/02/06 00:07

In article <MPG.1e22314197d508409896a7@fe04.buzzardnews.com>,
Isaacq <me@privacy.com> wrote:

> > OK, so you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
>
> Nicely stated counterpoint.

I don't have time to argue with the ignorant like that; it's like
arguing with a flat-earther or an "intelligent design" fanatic.

> > Move along; those of us who do know what we're talking about have
> > things to talk about.
>
> "us"? "we"? Hmm.

yeah, there are more than one of us.

> Yes, I see how it took you (singular) no time at all in the thread
> where you (singular) were repeatedly trying to demonstrate how much
> you (singular) know what you (singular) are talking about to
> demonstrate exactly how fucking little you (singular) know about what
> you (singular) are trying to talk about. Perhaps the rest of you
> (plural) will be along soon to help you (singular) out.

Considering that his message was in reply to <bingbong@spamcop.net>,
there are at least two of us, so my use of the plural is perfectly
correct.

> YOU: "You can listen to music purchased from the iTunes store on
> any device."
>
> ....WRONG. You simply can not.

Wrong; you can. Just burn it to a CD and reimport it.

> YOU: "Oh, point taken. My bad."....OOPS.

In response to the humorous remark that you can't listen to it on a
kitchen appliance. Or are you so anal retentive that don't understand
that "any device" in context means "any audio device"? And are you so
anal retentive that you're now going to say that they can't be played on
a turntable?

Unlike you, I'm not an arrogant, supercilious, offensive jerk who can't
admit making an error.

--
Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

[Back to original message]