|
|
Posted by Luke Bosman on 01/03/06 18:49
For heaven's sake, post properly. When you do, I'll read what you write.
Luke
NRen2k5 <napsterneorenegade@hotmail.com> wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --------------040101010105040908090004 Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
>
> Luke Bosman wrote:
>
> >Quoting order repaired.
> >
> >NRen2k5 <napsterneorenegade@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Luke Bosman wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >>>I dare say that your average Joe won't be listening on a system where
> >>>the difference between AAC and MP3 is immediately apparent. I have many
> >>>tracks that have been ripped from vinyl, cassette and, hey, even CD.
> >>>Frankly, when listening in my car (which is where I most use my iPod) I
> >>>cannot tell which tracks are in which format. When listening at home, I
> >>>have a darned good hi-fi on which the issue is unimportant.
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >>Believe me, you can tell the difference between iTunes' (SoundJam) MP3
> >>and AAC. The MP3 is racked with artifacting..
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Believe me, on my car stereo I cannot. What have you been doing in my car
> >with my iPod?
> >
> >Luke
> >
> >
>
> I'm not talking about you in your car. I'm talking about ordinary people,
> in ordinary listening environments. And believe me, in most people's
> living rooms, they /don't/ need a $1000+ hifi to tell the difference
> between iTunes' crummy MP3's and its AAC's. Anybody should be able to tell
> the difference even straight from the iPod with the stock earbuds.
>
> - NRen2k5
>
> --------------040101010105040908090004 Content-Type: text/html;
> charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html>
> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"
> http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff"
> text="#000000"> <br> <br> Luke Bosman wrote: <blockquote
> cite="mid1h8l8ln.v2w6vc1drfs1fN%25southend.unitedfc.5.lukebosman@spamgourm
> et.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Quoting order repaired.
>
> NRen2k5 <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
> href="mailto:napsterneorenegade@hotmail.com"><napsterneorenegade@hotmai
> l.com></a> wrote:
>
> </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Luke Bosman wrote: </pre>
> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> </pre> <blockquote type="cite">
> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">I dare say that your average Joe
> won't be listening on a system where the difference between AAC and MP3 is
> immediately apparent. I have many tracks that have been ripped from vinyl,
> cassette and, hey, even CD. Frankly, when listening in my car (which is
> where I most use my iPod) I cannot tell which tracks are in which format.
> When listening at home, I have a darned good hi-fi on which the issue is
> unimportant. </pre> </blockquote> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!---->
> </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Believe me, you can tell the
> difference between iTunes' (SoundJam) MP3 and AAC. The MP3 is racked with
> artifacting.. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> Believe me, on my
> car stereo I cannot. What have you been doing in my car with my iPod?
>
> Luke </pre> </blockquote> <br> I'm not talking about you in your car. I'm
> talking about ordinary people, in ordinary listening environments. And
> believe me, in most people's living rooms, they <i>don't</i> need a $1000+
> hifi to tell the difference between iTunes' crummy MP3's and its AAC's.
> Anybody should be able to tell the difference even straight from the iPod
> with the stock earbuds.<br> <br> - NRen2k5<br> </body> </html>
>
> --------------040101010105040908090004--
-- No-one reads signatures these days.
[Back to original message]
|