|
Posted by Justin on 11/16/78 11:36
Michelle Steiner wrote on [Wed, 04 Jan 2006 11:57:23 -0700]:
> In article <slrndro5hi.96a.nospam@debian.dns2go.com>,
> Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
>
>> > And that, sir, is essentially "living without it," unless one is a
>> > literalist.
>>
>> So, in fact, you have not lived without it.
>
> If you want to take it literally, uptight, and anal retentively, yes.
> If you want to take it metaphorically, as most people would, no.
>
Saying you have lived without something all your life most certainly
implies you have never used it. Whether that's what you meant that is
what you have said.
[Back to original message]
|