Reply to Re: Which way of mp3 compression is optimal for speech?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Mike Walsh on 01/25/06 17:30

Try VBR with something like this:
-m m -V 7 -q 0 -B 48 --lowpass 5
I have not tried these settings. You might want to experiment. A higher -V number will reduce file size. A lower -q number will reduce artifacts and increase file size only slightly. A lowpass filter is very effective for reducing file size.

"martin.mrazek@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I need to put a series of lectures on the Internet, thus I'm trying to
> find optimal balance in trade-off between size and quality. A good
> result is obtained by
>
> lame --abr 60 -m m file.wav file.mp3
>
> but it is still too lengthy and the decrease of ABR to 30 means too
> substantial deterioration of quality. So questions are: (1) is the ABR
> technology the best option as regards this purpose? (2) Wouldn't be
> other format than MP3 less capacity intensive? (ogg, wmf...) or are
> there any advices when working with speech rather than music?
>
> thanks
> Martin

--
Mike Walsh
West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S.A.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"