Posted by reply on 01/26/06 02:36

On 25 Jan 2006 05:06:35 -0800, "martin.mrazek@gmail.com"
<martin.mrazek@gmail.com> wrote:

|Hello,
|
|I need to put a series of lectures on the Internet, thus I'm trying to
|find optimal balance in trade-off between size and quality. A good
|result is obtained by
|
|lame --abr 60 -m m file.wav file.mp3
|
|but it is still too lengthy and the decrease of ABR to 30 means too
|substantial deterioration of quality. So questions are: (1) is the ABR
|technology the best option as regards this purpose? (2) Wouldn't be
|other format than MP3 less capacity intensive? (ogg, wmf...) or are
|there any advices when working with speech rather than music?
|
|thanks
|Martin

Try
-b 32 -m m -p --resample 22.05 --lowpass 7 -h

[Back to original message]