Posted by Curtis on 02/06/06 12:45

'twas 05 Feb 2006 08:58:41 GMT, when "fred-bloggs"
<fred-bloggs@hahahotmail.com> was compelled by mysterious forces of
nature to write:

>Curtis <sir_stimpyJAM@JAMhotmail.com> wrote in
>news:bd5au153h3suqnn9bf9s2fefpt2o5p6cig@4ax.com:
>
>
>No
>I'm afraid not, mono is the same size as stereo but better quality.

Except that mono only has to be half the size for the same quality.

64kbps mono = 128kbps stereo

--

It's a small world but I wouldn't want to paint it.

kick out the JAMS to reply

[Back to original message]