Posted by VinceH (real address) on 10/12/05 14:05

In article <k53qk1dkk396cqj080u57hh1tqsr4nd7v7@4ax.com>,
Lee@DVDDebate <lee@nospamw2designs.co.uk> wrote:

[I'm wasting my breath...]

> You are, yes, although if you think I'm some sort of newbie that
> doesn't understand the concept of spoiler space you might want to
> check how far my posting history goes back.

Your words and actions strongly suggest otherwise.

> As I see it, once a thread descends into spoiler territory people
> either read it or ignore it.

Which clearly indicates that you don't understand that
different people, using different platforms and news
clients, read usenet using different methods.

> Maintainging spoiler space in a thread just creates an
> inconvenience for those following it. I will admit, however, that
> adding 'spoilers' to the subject line may have been helpful.

But only helpful to a subset of readers.

What is wrong with using a basic common courtesy that
has been an accepted procedure on usenet since the
start? How difficult is it to hit return a couple of
dozen times?

VinceH

--
http://www.softrock.co.uk http://www.webchange.co.uk http://www.vinceh.com
A bio with some actual bones for fido content:
http://www.vinceh.com/vinceh/
Never, under any circumstances, accept a blow job from a zombie.

[Back to original message]