Posted by Justin on 10/07/05 03:05

The Man With No Name wrote on [Fri, 7 Oct 2005 12:22:48 +1000]:
>
> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:slrndkb15u.v9i.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>> Stan Brown wrote on [Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:56:12 -0400]:
>>> On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:47:43 -0400 in alt.video.dvd, Allan favored us
>>> with...
>>>> "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
>>>> because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable
>>>> from
>>>> -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free
>>>> time."
>>>> - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
>>>
>>> Great line, and oh so true!
>>>
>>> Viz a recent thread in rec.arts.tv where some morons insisted that
>>> Carlos tampering with Gabby's birth control pills on /Desperate
>>> Housewives/ was rape. Their justification was that it was more
>>> serious than jaywalking, or something.
>>
>> Well, it kind of is. Instead of non impregnating sex she got
>> impregnating sex and stuck with those consequences.
>
> So then, is it still rape if you use a condom?

In that situation, no.

Deliberately misleading someone into believing they have a birth control
method in play and you clearly know they don't.

Sort of like knowing you have an STD and the other person doesn't know

[Back to original message]