| 
	
 | 
 Posted by Steve Guidry on 08/29/05 14:16 
Hmmm . . . 
 
I went the other way with that issue . . . 
 
Specifically, we noticed that our "talking head" was blending into the 
background, so we just upped the backlight to compensate. 
 
Looks better on DVD, still Ok on VHS. 
 
 
--  
Steve Guidry 
Video Works, Inc. 
Live events for TV and Video 
www.videoworksinc.com 
800.844.4404 
 
 
 
 
"Bill Fright" <billfright@austin.rr.com> wrote in message 
news:6wzJe.135255$X76.84392@tornado.texas.rr.com... 
> I was catching up on my reading this morning and read an article in 
> Video Systems 2/2005 entitled Craft and Psychology. The short story is 
> how we should shoot differently if we know DVD will be the end product. 
> 
> It suggested using a 1/2 tiffen softFX or black diffusion filter to help 
> transcoders like Compressor do their job a little cleaner. Their point 
> was that compressing creates softness at the expense of contrast. I 
> didn't get too much farther in the article then that because I was busy 
> burning the magazine. I'm so tired of people developing excuses for poor 
> compression algorithms. 
> 
> I'm still shooting on BetacamSP and I refuse to move to DVcam because of 
> the lessor quality. Now here is this article telling me to degrade my 
> image to start with to aid a compressor (which beats the crap out of the 
> image anyway) to make things look better on a DVD. 
> 
> I've produced a ton of DVDs from my betacam field tapes and since I 
> don't create feature length shows I can get away with relatively 
> slighter compression scheme. The caveat to that is they still end up 
> being Mpeg2 which to me looks awful in a engineering sense. On the other 
> hand they really look pretty nice, quality wise, especially since 
> besides air they used to end up on VHS. 
> 
> So my question to all you guys is this. Is anyone filtering while 
> shooting specifically for DVD? Am I not getting something here? To be 
> sure I'm never going to filter for DVD it the show is also being 
> broadcast but I'm curious to what others think. 
> 
> The last thing is that 1/2 soft is pretty slight but still it's 
degradation! 
> 
> bill 
>
 
[Back to original message] 
 |