Posted by GMAN on 09/28/05 00:05

In article <9zpZe.1579$%L4.46@trndny02>, "doc" <doc@drdimento.net> wrote:
>nope. actually it looks great on the pc and in the camcorder pop out lcd,
>but on the tv it's terrible, very noticable, and actually so bad it
>distracts from the viewing, jerky, rachetting, or fragmented, (not
>pixelated) but almost like every other frame (or a few frames) are missing
>between each of those that are seen. almost like an old silent picture or
>one of those hand movies that you sorta fan. know what i mean?
>
>lacing??? hmmmmm how would i know? and how to fix?
>
>doc
>

It almost sounds like your captrue device or its capture codec is the getting
the "field order" backwards.


>"AnthonyR" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
>news:wogZe.842$Fc4.506@twister.nyc.rr.com...
>>
>> "doc" <doc@drdimento.net> wrote in message
>> news:7Y6Ze.3780$L15.3061@trndny01...
>>> me too. geez.
>>>
>>> u know i'm struggling with something right now. ever capture some DV and
>>> it views fine in the software then when it's exported (or make -
>>> whichever is preferred :o) to DVD the images are choppy when there are
>>> pans or zooms in and out?
>>>
>>> ideas?
>>>
>>> doc
>>>
>> Doc,
>> you mean when you view the mpeg encoded images on the PC?
>> Cause that could be normal interlacing you are seeing, that isn't visible
>> when viewed on regular tv after it's a dvd.
>> In the very beginning of dvd making, I experienced the same, and it drove
>> me nuts till someone told me it was nothing.
>> Some of the cheap encoders, nowadays add a feature called de-interlacing
>> or progressive capture, both avoid this effect that I am talking
>> about when viewed on a computer screen in the editing program. But maybe
>> you are talking about something else?
>>
>> AnthonyR.
>>
>>
>
>

[Back to original message]