Reply to Re: SVHS -- Apparently Kicks VHS's butt, but how does it compare to others?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Bob Ford on 10/14/05 03:28

On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 02:33:54 GMT, "ushere"
<kaywand@REMoVEaBUSebigpond.com> wrote:

>ford mustang kick butt in it's day too.
>
>now it's a collectors item, just like svhs....
>

Really now, well I just happen to have a 1965 Mustang GT that can
still kick butt on a lot of these rice burners and beamers ;-^)
>leslie
>
>
>"Gary Eickmeier" <geickmei@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:yTD3f.145527$xl6.116299@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>>
>>
>> Lansworth wrote:
>>> I couldn't phrase it better than what I put in my subject line, so I
>>> won't: SVHS -- Apparently Kicks VHS's butt, but how does it compare to
>>> others? I am aware it doesn't live up to formats like DVCAM, DVCPRO,
>>> etc. (thats a given), but does it produce a fairly decent image? I have
>>> heard it does have a fair amount of resolution, at about 400. Not
>>> excellent, but better than VHS. Thoughts? I want to hear what you have
>>> to say.
>>>
>> Why are you interested in SVHS?
>>
>> Gary Eickmeier
>
Bob Ford
Images In Motion
www.imagesinmotion.com

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"