Reply to Re: SVHS -- Apparently Kicks VHS's butt, but how does it compare to others?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Richard Crowley on 10/14/05 05:03

"Lansworth" wrote ...
>I couldn't phrase it better than what I put in my subject line, so I
> won't: SVHS -- Apparently Kicks VHS's butt, but how does it compare to
> others? I am aware it doesn't live up to formats like DVCAM, DVCPRO,
> etc. (thats a given), but does it produce a fairly decent image? I
> have
> heard it does have a fair amount of resolution, at about 400. Not
> excellent, but better than VHS. Thoughts? I want to hear what you have
> to say.

Somewhere out there on the WWW is hierarchical rank-
list of most all video formats you've ever heard of. In order
of quality. But I can't find my link to it, and I can't come up
with the right key words for a Google search to find it. :-(

S-VHS is indeed better than VHS, but not likely better than
DV. It wouldn't surprise me if S-VHS was better than MPEG2
(DVD quality).

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"