Posted by George Hammond on 10/12/05 09:34

On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:36:25 +0545, Mahatana Dick
<nospam@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>George Hammond, <ghammond1@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:28:50 +0545, Mahatana Dick
>> <nospam@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> George Hammond, <ghammond1@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> OK... all I'm sayinjg is this:
>>>>
>>>> It is possible to make a video movie, when played on
>>>> a t.v. in front of 10 kids (all less than 7) and 10
>>>> adults (all over 18)..... the movie will be INVISIBLE
>>>> to the kids, but clearly VISIBLE to the adults!
>>>>
>>>> That's exactly what I'm saying, and obviously such a thing is
>>>> PROVEABLE.... since it's easy enough to find 10 kids and 10
>>>> adults and TRY IT!
>>>>
>>>> NOW, such a thing has never been done before in the history of
>>>> the world...... but I say it can be done.... as a reslut of my
>>>> research on the SPOG.
>>>
>>
>>
>>> Go on then, do it. What are you waiting for?
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> I don't have to do it.
>> As a theoritician and the discovererof the SPOG all I have
>> to do is make an EASILY TESTABLE PREDICTION that will
>> prove the theory.
>

>The only reason you won't do it is because you know that it won't work; or
>at least you suspect it.


[Hammond]
I have every (experimental and theoretical) reason to believe that it
WILL work. For instance Riedel proved in 1966 that the PFF
of a 7 year old is only 10 frames/sec, while the PFF of an adult is 15
frames/sec....... that is a 33% difference..... and IS SUFFICIENT in
my opinion to render a specially constructed video INVISIBLE to the
kid, but VISIBLE to the adult.


>
>> THOUSANDS of my critics have been screaming...
>>
>> MAKE A TESTABLE PREDICTION!
>> MAKE A TESTABLE PREDICTION!
>> MAKE A TESTABLE PREDICTION!
>> MAKE A TESTABLE PREDICTION!
>>
>> WELL......... I JUST DID.....
>>
>> SO YOU'VE GOT NOTHING LEFT TO CRITICIZE...
>
>Would like to take bets on that, NetNutter? Nobody wants you to "MAKE AN
>EASILY TESTABLE PREDICTION " - from what I've been reading,

[Hammond]
sure talk is cheap.... they can talk the talk, but they can't walk the
walk.

>people have been telling you to prove it yourself, yet you continue to
>delude yourself into believing that your fuckwitted PREDCITON is
>proof enough, and not just 'proof' for your fuckwitted non-theory, but proof
>of the existence of God. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

[Hammond]
they asked for a "TESTABLE PREDICTION" and I gave it to them.
end of argument.




>
>> YOU WANNA PROVE ME WRONG..... YOU GO DO THE TEST...
>
>There is no need to do the test. You were already given a large amount of
>counter-argument, evidence and logic as to why it will not work.

[Hammond]
WRONG.

1. (Riedel 1966) experimentally PROVED there is a 33% difference
in the PFF between a 7 year old and a 15 year old. That is
SUFFICNET EVIDENCE that it will work.

2. NO ONE has, or can, cite any counter evidence. You're just a
mealy mouth liar, that's all.

> You snipped
>it, in its entirety and started yelling, "EASILY TESTABLE PREDICTION
> of the SPOG! EASILY TESTABLE PREDICTION of the SPOG!
>EASILY TESTABLE PREDICTION of the SPOG!"

[Hammond]
Hey... SORRY, but the fact that THERE IS a SIMPLE AND DRAMATIC
experimental test of the SPOG is a pain in the ass for you! Scream
about it all you like. The fact that I have made an EASILY TESTABLE
PREDICTION OF THE SPOG isn't going to go away just because you want it
to go away.

>
>> PUT UP OR SHUT UP!

========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
=======================================
Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
Send a blank email to COSAchurch@hotmail.com
and your email address will be added to the
COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
===========================
and please ask your news service to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===========================

[Back to original message]