Posted by George Hammond on 10/12/05 10:22

On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:32:29 +0545, Mahatana Dick
<nospam@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>George Hammond, <ghammond1@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:36:25 +0545, Mahatana Dick
>> <nospam@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> George Hammond, <ghammond1@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:28:50 +0545, Mahatana Dick
>>>> <nospam@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> George Hammond, <ghammond1@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> OK... all I'm sayinjg is this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is possible to make a video movie, when played on
>>>>>> a t.v. in front of 10 kids (all less than 7) and 10
>>>>>> adults (all over 18)..... the movie will be INVISIBLE
>>>>>> to the kids, but clearly VISIBLE to the adults!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's exactly what I'm saying, and obviously such a thing is
>>>>>> PROVEABLE.... since it's easy enough to find 10 kids and 10
>>>>>> adults and TRY IT!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NOW, such a thing has never been done before in the history of
>>>>>> the world...... but I say it can be done.... as a reslut of my
>>>>>> research on the SPOG.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Go on then, do it. What are you waiting for?
>>>>
>>>> [Hammond]
>>>> I don't have to do it.
>>>> As a theoritician and the discovererof the SPOG all I have
>>>> to do is make an EASILY TESTABLE PREDICTION that will
>>>> prove the theory.
>>>
>>
>>> The only reason you won't do it is because you know that it won't
>>> work; or at least you suspect it.
>>
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> I have every (experimental and theoretical) reason to believe that it
>> WILL work.
>


>Earlier you claimed to be a "theoretician"

[Hammond]
Got two degrees in physics to prove it.


> and disclaimed, by
>implication, all erxperiments. See...?

[Hammond]
You mis-spelled "experiments" phuckwit.


>
>>> Go on then, do it. What are you waiting for?
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> I don't have to do it.
>> As a theoritician and the discovererof the SPOG all I have
>> to do is make an ESSILY TESTABLE PREDITION that will
>> prove the theory.
>

>So, which is it? You've done the experiments therefore your prediction isn't
>a prediction, or you've not done the experiments and you're a liar?

[Hammond]
Neither phuckwit.

All a theory has to do is MAKE AN EASILY TESTABLE PREDICTION, and
then the charge of "NON-FALSIFIABILITY" is DESTROYED.

the SPOG is now "CLEARLY FALSIFIABLE" therefore

THE SPOG IS A LEGITIMATE SCIENTIFIC THEORY



>
>> the PFF of an adult is 15 frames/sec.
>
>Or less, yes?

[Hammond]
15 fps is the population AVERAGE.

Actually the relation:

PFF = IQ/5 - 5

has been experimentally shown to hold (Lehrl, et al)


>
>>> people have been telling you to prove it yourself, yet you continue
>>> to delude yourself into believing that your fuckwitted PREDCITON is
>>> proof enough, and not just 'proof' for your fuckwitted non-theory,
>>> but proof of the existence of God. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> they asked for a "TESTABLE PREDICTION" and I gave it to them.
>> end of argument.
>
>Well, no. There's still the matter of your your fuckwitted non-theory being
>a your fuckwitted non-theory.

[Hammond]
But you're a "PHUCKWIT".


>
>> 2. NO ONE has, or can, cite any counter evidence. You're just a
>> mealy mouth liar, that's all.
>

>You mean no one can cite anything at all that you will accept unless it is
>in 100% accord with your delusions, yes?


[Hammond]
No Phuckwit.......... I don't accept any evidence unless it
has been published in the PEER REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE.

and all of the evidence published in the PEER REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC
LITERATURE SUPPORTS THE SPOG.

The comments of INTERNET PHUCKWITS is irrelevant.


>
>>> You snipped
>>> it, in its entirety and started yelling, "EASILY TESTABLE PREDICTION
>>> of the SPOG! EASILY TESTABLE PREDICTION of the SPOG!
>>> EASILY TESTABLE PREDICTION of the SPOG!"
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Hey... SORRY, but the fact that THERE IS a SIMPLE AND DRAMATIC
>> experimental test of the SPOG is a pain in the ass for you!
>


>Well, if it's so simple, hop to it. What are you waiting for?

[Hammond]
Einstein made an EASILY TESTABLE PREDICTION of Genaral Relativity.

He said that it would bend starlight TWICE AS MUCH as Newtonian
gravity predicted. YOU DON'T EXPECT EINSTEIN TO GO OUT AND MEASURE
STARLIGHT DO YOU PHUCKWIT?

EDDINGTON MADE THE MEASUREMENTS AND EINSTEIN'S THEORY WAS PROVEN, A
HEADLIBNE PRODUCING EVENT IN 1920.


SAME WITH HAMMOND'S SPOG. HAMMOND HAS MADE AN

EASILY TESTABLE PREDICTION OF THE SPOG


NOW WE HAVE TO WAIT FOR SOME GREASY HANDED EXPERIMENTALIST
WITH DIRTY FINGERNAILS TO DO THE EXPERIMENT.

LIKE EINSTEIN, I DON'T GET MY HADS DIRTY, IF YOU DON'T MIND.

YAWN...
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
=======================================
Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
Send a blank email to COSAchurch@hotmail.com
and your email address will be added to the
COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
===========================
and please ask your news service to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===========================

[Back to original message]