Reply to Re: discreet smoke

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Jona Vark on 11/11/05 18:15

<mmaker@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1131704235.455808.90090@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Specs wrote:
> > I would steer clear as unless you have a very particular need for
> > smoke and flame you might get better value and functionality from the
likes
> > of Avid, Adobe or Apple.
>
> Digital Fusion is also pretty cool for compositing if that's what they
> need. Personally I much prefer the node-based design to Combustion's
> design, I haven't used Smoke or Flame but presume the interface is
> similar to Combustion.
>
> > I personally wouldn't buy into SGI hardware even their new stuff and
> > certainly not old stuff.
>
> Yeah, much as I liked working on SGIs ten years ago, a modern PC or Mac
> is almost certainly far faster than an old SGI.
>
> Mark
>

Combustion does have a schematic view which can be used in much the same
fashoin as DF.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"