Posted by Rick Merrill on 01/10/78 11:36

Steve Guidry wrote:

> Well, yes, digital video has its limitations. But they are mostly the
> doings of the users than the fault of the fact that it's digital. I have
> seen plain ol' analog composite properly displayed on a broadcast-grade
> monitor look absolutely stunning. On the other hand, the best of the
> digital world runs rings around it. I was particularly impressed with the
> picture quality of the Rose Bowl the other night, and I watched it via
> DirecTV.
>
> As an aside, when we're shooting gigs with our truck, (pics at
> www.videoworksinc.com) I routinely have to laugh at the "digital video boys"
> who show up to do their coverage of the event. It's just hilarious to me
> when they're so surprised when their XL/TRV/BR-DV something or other doesn't
> match up to the quality of my 10-year-old Sony 2/3" broadcast cameras. And
> these guys are supposedly "in the biz".

So you're saying Size DOES matter!

>
>

[Back to original message]