Posted by The Man With No Name on 12/25/02 11:29

"Frank Sereno" <fserenonospam@nospamsbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:mAj4f.476$W%7.180@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> I don't know about other folks, but if something receives an 80 out of 100
> score, that should mean that the show is fairly good in the view of the
> reviewer. But when you read the full review, he didn't like the series
> all that much, giving the story a score of 60.
>
> I think the score for the meat of a DVD, the actual show or movie, should
> make up the bulk of its review score. Rating extras, video transfer,
> etc., is good, but are less important than the show itself.
>

Actually, I'd disagree with you there. Generally, if I buy a DVD, it's
because I've already seen the movie (probably a few times,) and I read the
reviews to find out how good the DVD presentation is.
Besides which, the quality of a movie can be such a subjective thing. The
quality of a DVD, however, is something which people generally tend to agree
on.

[Back to original message]